Home | Contact Us | Blog

LNS Research


HomeCreate Account
Log in
  • Research Library
  • Solutions
  • Our Expertise
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  •                                                                                          

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Follow LNS Research

About LNS Research

LNS Research provides executives a platform for accessing unbiased research and benchmark data to improve business performance

About The Blog

The LNS Research Blog provides an informal environment for analysts to share thoughts and insights directly with our community on a range of technology and business topics

Latest Posts

  • The (Not-so-distant) Future of Manufacturing Software Platforms
  • The Missing Link For Managing Quality, Risk, and EH&S in Life Sciences
  • Companies With EQMS Outperform Others in OEE Performance [DATA]
  • New Intelligent Energy Report, Farm to Fork Traceability, and more...
  • Enterprise Energy Management for Industrial Companies
  • Offshore Wind Energy in Europe, The Big Three for Big Data, and more...
  • Why Design-Focused Firms Might Use PLM as a Quality Platform [DATA]
  • Insights from the MESA N.A. & Industry Week Best Plants Conferences
  • Understanding Energy Trends, Introduction to 3D Printing...[VIDEOS]
  • 9 Uses for Enterprise IT and MOM Software in Manufacturing Strategy

Posts by Category

  • About LNS Research (9)
  • Asset Performance Management (1)
  • Automated Demand Response (1)
  • Automotive Industry (2)
  • Benchmark Data (5)
  • Benchmark Research (2)
  • Benchmarking Research (5)
  • Best Practices (1)
  • Bill of Materials (1)
  • Business Process Management (3)
  • Business Value (1)
  • Chief Quality Officer (1)
  • China Manufacturing (1)
  • Closed Loop Quality Management (5)
  • Cloud-Computing (4)
  • Collaboration (1)
  • Complaint Management (1)
  • Compliance Management (1)
  • Consumer Products (1)
  • Continuous Improvement (7)
  • Corporate IT (1)
  • Cost of Quality (16)
  • Digital Revolution (3)
  • DPV (1)
  • Energy Management (11)
  • Energy Metrics (2)
  • Enterprise Bill of Process (2)
  • Enterprise Quality Management Software (34)
  • Enterprise Software (1)
  • Environment Health and Safety (1)
  • EQMS (64)
  • ERP (4)
  • ESM (9)
  • Executives (1)
  • Food Safety (4)
  • HACCP Software (2)
  • IEM (4)
  • Implementation (1)
  • Industrial Automation (4)
  • Industrial Automation 2.0 (2)
  • Industrial Energy Management (11)
  • Industrial Ethernet (1)
  • Industrial Networking (1)
  • Industry Trends (2)
  • Information Technology (2)
  • Interoperability (2)
  • ISO Standards (2)
  • IT Architecture (1)
  • Lean Manufacturing (2)
  • Life Sciences (2)
  • LNS Research Approach (1)
  • MaaS (1)
  • Management of Change (1)
  • Manufacturing (8)
  • Manufacturing Culture (2)
  • Manufacturing Metrics (10)
  • Manufacturing Operations (3)
  • Manufacturing Operations Management (12)
  • Manufacturing Software (39)
  • Mercury Marine (1)
  • MES (3)
  • MESA-WBF Merger (1)
  • Metrics (1)
  • Metrics that Matter (1)
  • Microsoft SharePoint (1)
  • MOM (7)
  • MOM Software (2)
  • NC/CAPA (1)
  • OEE (5)
  • Operational Excellence (23)
  • Operational Metrics (1)
  • Operational Risk Management (9)
  • Performance Indicators (1)
  • PLM (4)
  • Product Lifecycle Management (1)
  • Product Recall (3)
  • Product Recalls (2)
  • Product Traceability (6)
  • Quality Culture (5)
  • Quality Management (51)
  • Quality Management System (6)
  • Quality Metrics (2)
  • Quality Risk Management (3)
  • Research Library (1)
  • Risk Management (3)
  • SaaS (2)
  • SAP Manufacturing (2)
  • SCADA (1)
  • Service as a Software (1)
  • Share Learn and Improve (1)
  • Shop Floor Drivers (1)
  • Siemens (3)
  • Siemens PLM Connection (1)
  • Solution Selection Guide (13)
  • SPC Software (2)
  • Statistical Process Control (4)
  • Strategy (1)
  • Supplier Quality Management (7)
  • Supplier Risk Management (1)
  • Supply Chain Management (2)
  • Supply-Chain Management (2)
  • Sustainability (26)
  • Sustainability Management (1)
  • Sustainable Manufacturing (1)
  • Technological Innovation (2)
  • Technology Adoption (1)
  • Vendor Spotlight (7)
  • Warranty Management (2)
  • Weekly Roundup (18)

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Cost of Quality Metric: The Formulation Management Conundrum

Posted by Matthew Littlefield on Fri, Aug 31, 2012 @ 05:00 AM
  
Tweet  
  

Minimizing costs has been and always will be a critical component of industrial strategy. The growing global supply chain helps to improve operating margins, but in many ways, its complexities make it more difficult to compete. Additionally, regulatory burdens, among other areas, further shrink operating margins. Faced with pressure, managers are continuously looking for innovative solutions to improve financial and operational performance.

As companies search for ways to cut costs, none may be more easily attainable than simply altering the formulation of the product. By decreasing product quality specifications, companies can quickly improve operating margins. However, this is essentially cutting a corner, and when it comes to quality, you can only cut so many corners before it begins to affect business performance. In a recent conversation with a large Consumer Products company, we discussed the challenges associated with balancing cost and product quality.Secret Sauce 2 0

In this blog, we'll discuss the relationship between quality, cost, and product formulations, especially as it relates to Consumer Products companies.

The Cost-Quality-Formulation Relationship

We've written a number of blog posts on measuring Cost of Quality, advising companies on the value of the metric. It's true, companies that measure the Cost of Quality are, on average, more successful in other operational KPIs. Unfortunately, however, there are pitfalls as well, especially around product quality and the dreaded downward cycle of recipes and formulations.

It can be very easy for companies looking for quick cost savings to start altering product formulations. Take the food and beverages industry for example. This can include reductions in key ingredients (like fats, solids, or natural flavorings), substitution in key ingredients (likely with artificial stabilizers or emulsifiers), changes in packaging, and more. From a strict Cost of Quality analysis perspective, these changes will likely have no impact. In fact, it may even create a reduction in the Cost of Quality. Often, artificially stabilized and emulsified products have fewer defects, reduced fill weight issues, and longer shelf life.

However, in the eyes of the consumer, these products may be of a much lower quality. Consumers don't think in terms of "Cost of Quality". Instead, consumers have a sense of quality associated with a particular brand and can be extremely sensitive to formulation changes. So what should a company do when evaluating formulations and potential options for change. For many, it may be useful to start taking a closed loop quality management approach that integrates PLM and quality.

Closed Loop Quality Management

Feedback loops are an important part of ensuring product quality in the eyes of the consumer. Defects and quality issues often arise well past the stage in the value chain where the root cause resides. This means companies must flow information across functional groups to ensure corrective and preventive actions are effectively implemented. Unfortunately, companies typically don't also include formulation changes, recipe changes, or engineering change orders in this analysis.

In many cases, a product may be changed based on an economic analysis, eventually causing increases in customer complaints, but not causing a non-conformance because the product is within the "new" specification. In these cases, companies lose a valuable opportunity to learn about customers and what they value about the products. This is clearly a challenge for many companies and there is no quick nor easy solution.

Our recommendation, don't only focus on quality as it relates to non-conformance to product specifications. Instead, closed loop quality management is a valuable approach to help flow information through the organization and it's most valuable when it includes changes to product formulations, recipes, and bill of materials.

Is this an issue that your company is currently dealing with? If so, we would be interested in hearing more about the approaches you have taken in solving the problem. This is an interesting and emerging area of quality management and we're still a long way from establishing widely adopted best practices.

3cd3fcd0-d362-4783-b4ed-9f59964c0774

You might also be interested in:

Top 5 Challenges in the Consumer Products Industry

Improving Food Safety: Insights from Mars' and Dole's Product Recalls

Manufacturing Operations Management: Lessons from Dell

For thought leadership sent directly to you, click to subscribe to our blog today.

Tags: Cost of Quality, Operational Excellence, Quality Management, Manufacturing Metrics

Comments

Matt, 
A great post and I certainly agree with closed loop quality. As you know, I have also been a big proponent of merging R&D and quality together, and I think PLM can play an important role. More on that in "Expanding PLM's Purview - Quality and Risk Management" at http://tech-clarity.com/plm-quality-risk-management/1354.  
 
Specifically for consumer products companies, you bring up a great point in cost reduction - "product quality in the eyes of the consumer." Saving a penny a can (or even a case) can drive profits to the bottom line. That is, if the consumer still favors your product. What I have seen the best companies do is really research what the consumer perceives as quality. For example, I once had a conversation about the perceived quality of a can of tomatoes. What do people value most? Taste, right? Wrong. Very few consumers ever taste the product. Instead, the can is opened and dumped into a pot with other ingredients almost immediately. So what do they perceive most in regards to quality? According to my client (don't kill the messenger) it is color. If it looks red and ripe people are happy.  
 
So what does that story tell us? They can optimize cost and vary specs other than color without damaging consumer perception - and drive money to the bottom line. It's all about understanding the voice of the customer, tying it to product requirements, and then keeping that front and center throughout R&D / formulation (and later cost optimization / value management programs). 
 
Great topic! The more we can bring design and quality into the same conversation the better. And unless you are in a big rush, use fresh tomatoes in your recipes at home.
Posted @ Friday, August 31, 2012 9:10 AM by Jim Brown
Jim, 
 
Thanks for the very insightful comment. When I was thinking about the post last night before it published I was thinking about the same issues you bring up. A deep understanding of the consumer and for food companies this often depends on the connection between marketing and R&D. This relationship drives a lot of what happens with new projects and changes to formulations and if both aren't in lock-step a lot can go wrong. For success, it is about good market research on the front end as well as follow up market research on the back end to understand the negative as well as positive consumer perceptions on new or altered products. 
 
Matt
Posted @ Friday, August 31, 2012 10:06 AM by Matthew Littlefield
Matt: 
Great article. Formulation changes are easier to disguise. When size of product shrinks I sometimes think consumers are angrier about that than a price increase. Shrinking the product is taking something away. It also makes the value equation a little more visible in some respects. 
 
I am old enough to remember when a candy bar was much bigger. When I look at a Hershey's with almonds I tend to think about how much bigger it was when I was a kid rather than how much less it cost.
Posted @ Saturday, September 01, 2012 9:14 AM by Ryan Sarti
Hi Ryan, 
 
I agree - there was a not so far distant day when a half gallon of ice cream was still 64 ounces...Size and packaging is another variable in the product quality equation that must be considered and revisited after changes are made. 
 
Matt
Posted @ Saturday, September 01, 2012 6:17 PM by Matthew Littlefield
I trully want to thank LNS Research Team for insightful and constructive analysis..... 
Harold Mujanayi Badibanga
Posted @ Monday, September 03, 2012 4:09 AM by Harold Mujanayi Badibanga
Comments have been closed for this article.
Error sending email
Email sent successfully

Email article
Email To : 
Your name : 
Message : (maximum 200 characters)
Blog | Research Library | Solutions | Our Expertise | Blog | About | Contact | Thank You | Global Quality Advisory Council

© 2013 matthewlittlefield.com