Whether you're interested in quality management, energy management, manufacturing operations, or the general evolution of technologies, this article round up has something for you. This week we explore additional reasoning on why an RFP may prove to be a risky move for your organizations, industrial acronym definitions, early survey findings, and an overview on the “Internet of Everything.”
“Is your CSP working with you to curtail kW during DR dispatches according to your ISO or PUC rules and regulations?” – Ali Zelisko, EnerNOC
Confused? Not to worry. Ali Zelisko of EnerNOC published a handy list to ease the pain of figuring out what those acronyms actually mean. Comprised of the top 20 must-know acronyms in the energy management sector, this list covers demand response, energy efficiency, and general management topics. For an even deeper dive beyond a definition, Zelisko included links to corresponding information on each subject. 20 energy management acronyms.
Tweet this list | Share on LinkedIn
For further evaluation of industrial acronyms, you may also want to reference this recent article published by Principal Analyst Mark Davidson, MOM’s Alphabet Soup: 20 Manufacturing Acronyms You Need to Know.
This is the second part of Gordon Benzie’s, of Apriso, discussion around why an RFP (request for proposal) may be riskier than most of us think. If you missed Part 1, access it here. The reasoning being that next-generation software may not play by the rules of traditional approaches or prior installed solutions, risking an even bigger headache than intended. Benzie provides five rules of thumb for evaluating the choice of implementing new solutions in this day and age, applying principles from a Robert Merton Harvard Business Review article. 5 rules of thumb.
Tweet this article | Share on LinkedIn
The Internet of Everything (IoE) is a massive societal and technological shift. Cisco estimates that by 2020 there will be 50 billion “connected things” sensing and collecting data, which is 5 times more than today’s projected number. Such technologies are on the horizon and may be impacting our daily lives in years to come. Rachael McBrearty discusses how the IoE includes Quantified Self Movement; “infusing technology directly into people’s lives, collecting data and gleaning insights that may in the future improve health, happiness, and productivity." Here at LNS, we have been researching the evolution of cloud, mobility, big data, and other emerging technologies as McBrearty commented on. Aside from affecting personal lives, our team is intrigued by how the Internet of Everything will shake up the manufacturing industry and we intend to publish discussions as these advancements evolve. But for now, read Rachael’s article.
Tweet about the IoE | Share on LinkedIn
Interested in learning what the top strategic manufacturing objectives are for executives in 2013? You’ve come to the right place. It’s been almost two months now since our team launched the 2013-2014 Manufacturing Operations Management (MOM) Research Library and Survey. The survey, which fuels LNS's social research model, asks questions around technology adoption, business processes, manufacturing culture and strategy, and more. The data collected will act as the foundation for research reports, and answer some of the industry's most pressing questions such as the one above. We were eager to review the early findings, and couldn’t help but providing our community with a sneak peek as well. Enjoy! MOM early findings.
Tweet these results | Share on LinkedIn
As always, if you have any recommendations or stumble upon an interesting article that you believe will benefit the LNS community, please feel free to share this information in the comment box below.
