Don’t Confuse Maturity with Sophistication When Pursuing Operational Excellence

Maturity_Model.pngEver since the Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie-Mellon University introduced its Capability Maturity Model (CMM) in the late 80’s/early 90’s to describe and assess the software development process, it has been applied to almost every type of process model there is; including Lean, sustainability, and more. There is no denying that an organization’s maturity in managing critical business processes is highly correlated to its overall business success. Click here to speak to Dan

LNS Research has talked about our Maturity Model for Quality, starting with blog posts in early 2014. This is why process maturity is such a critical factor when any enterprise pursuing Digital Transformation looks at the pillars of Operational Excellence that are fundamental to the success of its efforts. At LNS Research we have identified six areas that Operational Excellence pillars should be judged in:

  • Strategy & Execution
  • Leadership & Culture
  • Organizational Capabilities
  • Business Process
  • Technology Capabilities
  • Performance Management & KPIs

Where many companies struggle when trying to assess maturity is the confusion around the characteristics of process maturity with sophistication. In doing so, they risk focusing on the wrong activities at the wrong time.

The Difference Between Sophistication & Maturity

In one of my 2014 posts where I wrote about apply CMM’s to Asset Performance Management (APM) I explained the reasons you should not confuse your approach to maintenance with your maturity vis-à-vis APM. I posited that just because you were using reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) tools it did mean you were highly mature and conversely, that a highly mature approach to APM meant you had to use RCM. This same argument holds true for all the pillars of Operational Excellence. That is, just using a more sophisticated business process doesn’t guarantee maturity. In fact, too much sophistication without appropriate maturity yields the business equivalent of “Toddlers & Tiaras”; cute to look at, but often highly dysfunctional. The two elements where sophistication and maturity are frequently confused are “Technology Capabilities” and “Business Process.”

The Risk of a Technology Mismatch

When an organization deploys technology that is too far ahead of the skill level of those expected to use it or it uses technology inappropriately, there is the risk that actual damage may occur; more than just a wasted investment. Tools too powerful applied to the wrong problem can be like trying to use a chain saw to sharpen a pencil – you may destroy the very process you are trying to improve. Even if the tool is the right one for the job, risks are still there since the results may not be as expected if unskilled people are using it. The technology mismatch problem can also manifest itself in the opposite way. If you ask someone to cut a tree down with only a pocket knife, they may become so frustrated they abandon the task and pursue other activities.

Business Processes Must Be Appropriate

As I explained in my APM example, condition-based maintenance (CBM) might be the right tool to monitor a critical piece of equipment, such as a motor on a feedwater pump of a boiler (by looking at heat, vibration, current draw, etc.). But instrumenting and monitoring the vibration and temperature on the casters on a dumpster clearly doesn’t make sense. In the case of the dumpster reactive maintenance, i.e. oiling the wheels if they are sticking and the dumpster is hard to push, it is adequate. In the quality realm statistical process control (SPC) is an appropriate tool to monitor some production processes, but it is probably overkill when monitoring a process such as emptying the wastebaskets in an office every evening. Applying the right technique for the job is critical. Just because you know a specific technique doesn’t mean you should use that technique for every problem you encounter.

Balancing People, Process and Technology for Operational Excellence

At LNS Research we have consistently emphasized the interaction of people, process and technology when pursuing Operational Excellence. As enterprises pursue Digital Transformation it is important to remember that these three elements are interconnected, it is not just about the digital technology.

Research Spotlight: A Methodology to Modernize Operational Excellence

All entries in this Industrial Transformation blog represent the opinions of the authors based on their industry experience and their view of the information collected using the methods described in our Research Integrity. All product and company names are trademarks™ or registered® trademarks of their respective holders. Use of them does not imply any affiliation with or endorsement by them.

Subscribe Now

Become an LNS Research Member!

As a member-level partner of LNS Research, you will receive our expert and proven Advisory Services. These exclusive benefits give your team:

  • Regular advisory sessions with our highly experienced LNS Research Analysts
  • Access to the complete LNS Research Library
  • Participation in members-only executive Roundtable events
  • Important, continuous knowledge of Industrial Transformation (IX)

Let us help you with key decisions based on our solid research methodology and vast industrial experience. 


Similar posts


Stay on top of the latest industrial transformation insights from our expert analysts

The Industrial Transformation and Operational Excellence Blog is an informal environment for our analysts to share thoughts and insights on a range of technology and business topics.